Why I'm not a Humean

There is an inconsistency between the access we have to our conscious lives and Humean thesis of causal generalism. This was first drawn attention by John Hawthorne, whose argument withstands a number objections. Nevertheless, it has weaknessess. The premise must be weakened if Humeans are compelled accept it, consequently, second will stronger retain validity. I shore up case against Humeanism providing revised premises along with new defences them. show why this also provides lesson for non-Humeans about epistemology relations.